primary human bone marrow derived mscs (PromoCell)
Structured Review
![Fig. 1. Screening of cytokines and small molecules for LSEC differentiation. (A) The schematic representation of BM-MSC differentiation. (B) qPCR analysis of the expression levels of LYVE1 and CD36 in BM-MSC-derived cells. On the y-axis, the expression levels are shown as a relative value to those of <t>BM-MSCs.</t> All data are presented as mean ± SD (n ¼ 3). Significant differences were evaluated using a one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's post-hoc test (*p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001 compared with BFTc [BMP4, FGF8b, TGF-b inhibitor, and cAMP]). Abbreviations: B; BMP4, F; FGF8b, T; TGF-b signal inhibitor, c; cAMP.](https://pub-med-unpaywalled-images-cdn.bioz.com/pub_med_ids_ending_with_5681/pm37575681/pm37575681__page4_image1.jpg)
Primary Human Bone Marrow Derived Mscs, supplied by PromoCell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 200 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/primary human bone marrow derived mscs/product/PromoCell
Average 96 stars, based on 200 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Generation of functional liver sinusoidal endothelial-like cells from human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells."
Article Title: Generation of functional liver sinusoidal endothelial-like cells from human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells.
Journal: Regenerative therapy
doi: 10.1016/j.reth.2023.07.006
Figure Legend Snippet: Fig. 1. Screening of cytokines and small molecules for LSEC differentiation. (A) The schematic representation of BM-MSC differentiation. (B) qPCR analysis of the expression levels of LYVE1 and CD36 in BM-MSC-derived cells. On the y-axis, the expression levels are shown as a relative value to those of BM-MSCs. All data are presented as mean ± SD (n ¼ 3). Significant differences were evaluated using a one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's post-hoc test (*p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001 compared with BFTc [BMP4, FGF8b, TGF-b inhibitor, and cAMP]). Abbreviations: B; BMP4, F; FGF8b, T; TGF-b signal inhibitor, c; cAMP.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Derivative Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: Fig. 2. Analysis of the expression of LSEC-related markers. (A) The schematic representation of BM-MSC differentiation to LSEC-like cells. (B) Brightfield images of the BM-MSCs and BM-MSC-derived cells. Scale bar ¼ 500 mm. (C) qPCR analysis of gene expression of LYVE1, CD36, CD32b, F8, PLVAP, CD31, and VEGFR2 in the BM-MSCs and BM-MSC-derived cells. On the y-axis, the expression levels are shown as a relative value to those of BM-MSCs. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n ¼ 6, sum of two independent experiments, n ¼ 3 for each experiment). (D) Immunocytochemistry analysis of LYVE1 (green) and CD36 (red) in the BM-MSCs and BM-MSC-derived cells. The nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar ¼ 50 mm. (E) The expression level of CD32 in the BM-MSCs and BM-MSC-derived cells was measured using flow cytometry analysis. The values of mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of CD32 expression were normalized by the MFI of isotype control. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n ¼ 3). Significant differences were evaluated using an unpaired two-tailed Student's t-test (***p < 0.001). (F) The percentage of LYVE1- or CD36-positive cells in the BM-MSC-derived cells was measured using flow cytometry analysis.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Derivative Assay, Gene Expression, Immunocytochemistry, Cytometry, Control, Two Tailed Test
Figure Legend Snippet: Fig. 3. Evaluation of endothelial cell-related functions. (A) Tube-formation assay of the BM-MSCs, BM-MSC-derived cells, and HUVECs. Scale bar ¼ 200 mm. (B) acLDL-uptake assay. BM-MSCs, BM-MSC-derived cells, and HUVECs were cultured in a medium containing Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated acLDL to measure their ability to take up acLDL. Scale bar ¼ 20 mm. Abbreviation: LDL, low-density lipoprotein.
Techniques Used: Tube Formation Assay, Derivative Assay, Cell Culture
Figure Legend Snippet: Fig. 4. Evaluation of LSEC-related functions. (A) HA-uptake assay. BM-MSCs, BM-MSC-derived cells, and HUVECs were cultured in a medium containing fluoresceinamine- conjugated HA to measure their ability to take up HA. (B) IgG-uptake assay. BM-MSCs, BM-MSC-derived cells, and HUVECs were cultured in a medium containing Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated IgG to measure their ability to endocytose IgG. Scale bar ¼ 20 mm. Abbreviation: HA, hyaluronic acid.
Techniques Used: Derivative Assay, Cell Culture
Figure Legend Snippet: Fig. 5. Evaluation of the differentiation capacity of primary human BM-MSCs into LSEC-like cells (A) The schematic representation of the differentiation of primary human BM- MSCs into LSEC-like cells. (B) qPCR analysis of gene expression of LYVE1, CD36, CD32b, and F8 in primary human BM-MSCs and primary human BM-MSC-derived cells. On the y-axis, the expression levels are shown as a relative value to those of primary human BM-MSCs. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n 8, sum of two independent experiments, n 3 for each experiment.). Significant differences were evaluated using an unpaired two-tailed Student's t-test (*p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001). (C) The percentage of LYVE1- or CD36- positive cells in the primary human BM-MSC-derived cells was measured using flow cytometry analysis. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n ¼ 3). (D) acLDL-uptake assay. BM-MSCs, BM-MSC-derived cells, and HUVECs were cultured in a medium containing Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated acLDL to measure their ability to take up acLDL. Scale bar ¼ 20 mm. (E) HA- uptake assay. Primary human BM-MSCs and primary human BM-MSC-derived cells were cultured in a medium containing fluoresceinamine-conjugated HA to measure their ability to take up HA. Scale bar ¼ 20 mm. Abbreviation: LDL, low-density lipoprotein; HA, hyaluronic acid.
Techniques Used: Gene Expression, Derivative Assay, Expressing, Two Tailed Test, Cytometry, Cell Culture


